{"id":"W2108625807","doi":"10.1109/20.952659","title":"Irregular tetrahedra for finite element analysis in electromagnetics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tetrahedron; Finite element method; Flexibility (engineering); Electromagnetics; Computational electromagnetics; Computer science; Electromagnetic field; Structural engineering; Physics; Geometry; Electronic engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000181889,0.0002441967,0.0003193346,0.0006134338,0.0000694466,0.00003525724,0.0001540643,0.0001348436,0.0006832694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001333713,0.0002725293,0.0002165956,0.001803797,0.00003667897,0.00004679033,5.638644e-7,0.000260224,0.00001870822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009543366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000154822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009603115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001056692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985213,0.00006009304,0.0004372231,0.0002710478,0.0002183152,0.0004919845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990304,0.0004412605,0.00002863871,0.000322108,0.00005469949,0.000122875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295426,0.0001609152,0.0001061209,0.00001836718,0.0001204473,0.000004799546,0.00008354559,0.8886621,0.005350562,0.00004672296,0.00006794857,0.1053255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076747,0.001184874,0.001828073,0.000008110912,0.0004032517,0.000003295659,0.00002396501,0.9721668,0.01420455,0.0004842171,0.008239939,0.0003761886],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04473863,0.0002706183,0.952987,0.0001429117,0.0002536724,0.0003878193,0.00002091217,0.0002081357,0.0009903158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533128,0.0005782939,0.04471282,0.0001375831,0.00004084977,0.0001254045,0.000009925295,0.00004980913,0.001032558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01423095760936631,"score_gpt":0.2640795162261437,"score_spread":0.2498485586167774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}