{"id":"W2108627892","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.032","title":"Integrating accessibility and intactness into large-area conservation planning in the Canadian boreal forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; University of Victoria; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Boreal; Biodiversity; Taiga; Nature reserve; Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006163059,0.0001006281,0.00008709788,0.0000415919,0.0002438073,0.0001352663,0.0001927246,0.00009935052,0.0003415929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003263873,0.00006108829,0.00001527306,0.0002596966,0.0001617527,0.0003564363,0.00009065481,0.0001366137,0.00006625045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001794213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6109233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7820346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991305,0.0001364778,0.0001971215,0.0002089957,0.0001002067,0.0002266663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995679,0.000166075,0.00006578598,0.0001266444,0.00001290777,0.00006068935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005207196,0.00001246945,0.9901464,0.000003370844,0.000001200097,0.000001428895,0.0005680358,0.000005911718,0.00006229834,0.003222812,0.003822064,0.002148809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001319484,0.00003854456,0.9748079,0.000009067854,0.000001766109,8.215966e-7,0.0002373104,0.01281982,0.000003590819,0.00615979,0.005704423,0.00008508204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800375,0.00001049643,0.00007980894,0.006369721,0.00002679715,0.0004061946,0.000001743569,0.00001972347,0.01304806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937963,0.000003389665,0.0003182106,0.005636783,0.00001881394,0.00007961989,0.00009687471,0.000002851332,0.00004715462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1711113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3916675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04818834345021094,"score_gpt":0.2832179260537468,"score_spread":0.2350295826035358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}