{"id":"W2108754848","doi":"10.1142/s0218194006002938","title":"A FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRAGMATIC QUALITY OF Z SPECIFICATIONS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Compromise; Software quality; Software engineering; Specification language; Risk analysis (engineering); Formal specification; Software quality control; Software; Programming language; Software development; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03029888,0.001784615,0.001214736,0.007527569,0.004116383,0.01222435,0.003066097,0.005427837,0.004481908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05394284,0.00150344,0.00258785,0.00373939,0.02385163,0.0181148,0.007391701,0.00705448,0.0007585789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005634664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00698181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006320246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003511976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9654694,0.01924977,0.003470979,0.002138634,0.008287302,0.001383977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529313,0.02761936,0.004268306,0.006291221,0.007565728,0.001323946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007480083,0.000006442862,0.00007170782,0.00006515008,0.000005779554,0.00004964328,0.0006270509,0.001265925,0.0002551228,0.9930661,0.0003143383,0.004265319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003278864,0.00004980915,0.000142941,0.0001877456,0.00002016035,0.000152521,0.0006751887,0.01147039,0.000542843,0.9654607,0.02122046,0.00004435376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004421379,0.001278714,0.9747851,0.004235801,0.0001393816,0.0002224103,0.00007415957,0.0002689025,0.01457407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1925286,0.001493025,0.800416,0.0008979038,0.0002626292,0.0008849346,0.0001752277,0.0001674461,0.003174293],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03029888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1602377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03496447777121112,"score_gpt":0.3128131571523523,"score_spread":0.2778486793811412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}