{"id":"W2108754848","doi":"10.1142/s0218194006002938","title":"A FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRAGMATIC QUALITY OF Z SPECIFICATIONS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Compromise; Software quality; Software engineering; Specification language; Risk analysis (engineering); Formal specification; Software quality control; Software; Programming language; Software development; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976301,0.0001533748,0.0002414562,0.0003412169,0.00003917018,0.0001078048,0.001000485,0.00006795202,0.000002856065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005354358,0.0001255623,0.0001478376,0.0002937435,0.00002592432,0.0002563132,0.0001275577,0.000292749,0.000001424245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008570467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007496148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007701714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.29061e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986371,0.00001482681,0.0006144598,0.0001459488,0.0003844201,0.0002032168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921749,0.006641255,0.0002002016,0.0002605604,0.0006537135,0.00006936085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003934657,0.0002822469,0.009806802,0.0006628598,0.0007236569,0.00001819185,0.001428374,0.4932472,0.007155965,0.4632669,0.0008622385,0.0225062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002466515,0.000276158,0.3113621,0.001865432,0.00008783832,0.0004436755,0.00009465279,0.6333898,0.00947654,0.007280969,0.03221401,0.001042327],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02075958,0.003062282,0.9741284,0.000244313,0.001568821,0.0001169174,0.000009189842,0.0001045874,0.0000058756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6666489,0.00005704151,0.3326856,0.000003424056,0.0005390418,0.00001719018,0.000001424602,0.00002067641,0.00002672333],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6458893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6410053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03496447777121112,"score_gpt":0.3128131571523523,"score_spread":0.2778486793811412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}