{"id":"W2108799600","doi":"10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112","title":"Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Anthropology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":646,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Common-pool resource; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sovereignty; Politics; Property rights; Sociology; Common property; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Tragedy of the commons; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Economics; Computer science; History; Management; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03548631,0.0004813195,0.0008956954,0.005409329,0.004315573,0.01202259,0.002235733,0.002268774,0.004168456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0250942,0.0003903167,0.0004902672,0.006492449,0.04585029,0.01020144,0.006885528,0.003473652,0.0002843227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01116718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009017402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004147989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006937141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736391,0.02224587,0.0003869175,0.001292357,0.001939422,0.0004962287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624106,0.03130866,0.00105984,0.002815885,0.001963171,0.0004419764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005632769,0.00001056751,0.0003622613,0.0001208623,0.000004929124,0.00002933841,0.003684795,0.0003426321,0.00004993144,0.9834858,0.0009763156,0.01092687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008469047,0.00002434845,0.0007902348,0.00104886,0.00001050809,0.00005960569,0.01298625,0.001558708,0.0004739424,0.8882071,0.09481079,0.00002116911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06196,0.05259279,0.410968,0.1006513,0.001400015,0.0009849855,0.0002604328,0.0001597789,0.3710227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844357,0.01693034,0.08144551,0.00246894,0.0005772929,0.001067275,0.00008307385,0.00009644918,0.01289548],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03548631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1876718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01139554011545105,"score_gpt":0.3045607279310072,"score_spread":0.2931651878155562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}