{"id":"W2108997345","doi":"10.1071/wr08069","title":"Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Transect; Wildlife; Biology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Marten; Wildlife conservation; Microsatellite; Ecology; Habitat; Predation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03026055,0.001401355,0.0009982113,0.003195995,0.0009107977,0.0009741668,0.00118505,0.00147582,0.0003275556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02615849,0.0006078384,0.001336303,0.001013289,0.0008992091,0.001297575,0.001041736,0.0007239925,0.0002225388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006216872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01133001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03255218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846805,0.01061077,0.0009098548,0.001459351,0.001947481,0.0003920473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538318,0.03206525,0.003302345,0.001592097,0.008617393,0.0005911543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001758283,0.001868177,0.7985258,0.002791713,0.001659936,0.001799402,0.006044148,0.002725908,0.01357171,0.0001974211,0.0003888878,0.1686686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001965122,0.02321046,0.9009657,0.0006729569,0.002313671,0.01110913,0.005327512,0.02665542,0.02398245,0.0003743179,0.004940708,0.0002511011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819713,0.005934318,0.009700649,0.0002059891,0.00003382177,0.0006561995,0.0001140426,0.00003554907,0.001348042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242843,0.004303019,0.06972811,0.0001815536,0.00005515974,0.0003321207,0.0002221797,0.00004420685,0.0008494093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03026055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2008969710332779,"score_gpt":0.4791123460968686,"score_spread":0.2782153750635907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}