{"id":"W2109063509","doi":"10.1109/wcre.2006.12","title":"An Industrial Case Study of Program Artifacts Viewed During Maintenance Tasks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artifact (error); Workflow; Task (project management); Key (lock); Process (computing); Software maintenance; Software; Exploratory research; Software engineering; Software development; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Database; Systems engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003171092,0.0001113225,0.0001532647,0.0001354773,0.00006271664,0.0001130732,0.0005514732,0.00005158982,0.00001091176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001437991,0.0000951716,0.00002687029,0.0005936797,0.00002482883,0.0003324448,0.0001671656,0.000185084,0.000009018001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004361434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004694168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001874051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002346682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986252,0.0000645546,0.0002563151,0.0003335973,0.0003683912,0.0003519846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.0001215557,0.0000470181,0.0007025405,0.0001093098,0.00009894747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010122,0.01671491,0.5326825,0.0001712306,0.0001466802,0.02911969,0.004980189,0.02730233,0.01125732,0.002992612,0.001925857,0.3726056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01574159,0.009617453,0.7379149,0.0001808943,0.00003831683,0.005421133,0.003007566,0.1552034,0.06926857,0.0004099429,0.001145083,0.002051199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986056,0.0000070773,0.01251206,0.00002260898,0.0001353625,0.0006548894,4.588576e-7,0.0005175102,0.00009401359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913799,2.123386e-7,0.008334724,0.000002937257,0.00008251468,0.000062486,5.264854e-7,0.00001006439,0.0001266189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3705544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3880985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04223354369730759,"score_gpt":0.311929686922468,"score_spread":0.2696961432251604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}