{"id":"W2109184576","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-3180.2002.00309.x","title":"A risk‐qualified approach to calculate locally varying herbicide application rates","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Weed Research","topic":"Weed Control and Herbicide Applications","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Alberta; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Weed; Weed control; Profit (economics); Agricultural engineering; Competition (biology); Environmental science; Mathematics; Agronomy; Economics; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204003,0.0001468983,0.0001934134,0.0000530085,0.0007808953,0.00015403,0.0005664426,0.0001315868,0.0003593223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001525698,0.0000629518,0.0000850847,0.001379483,0.00009464433,0.0000856026,0.0001457809,0.0004433597,0.001689179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005730486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007305783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01111467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000460697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976402,0.0003100116,0.0002820829,0.0005539485,0.0005721729,0.0006415765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987215,0.000464908,0.00005803791,0.0001947146,0.0002663778,0.0002943922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003227861,0.0002226879,0.0003130347,0.000006892499,0.00001807494,9.500118e-7,0.0001940163,0.0001721643,0.8560687,0.003117929,0.003761566,0.1360917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001822997,0.001332625,0.3467236,0.0000817225,0.00007273939,0.00002768322,0.002147892,0.142445,0.01895264,0.01892636,0.4657043,0.001762547],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8666788,0.0007574137,0.003663106,0.01605153,0.00004602631,0.003561183,0.00005699159,0.0003660449,0.1088189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950343,0.000014287,0.0005293806,0.0003207079,0.0003360831,0.001118306,0.00004026578,0.000003031879,0.002603651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09240366149948619,"score_gpt":0.3240057572502033,"score_spread":0.2316020957507171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}