{"id":"W2109195368","doi":"10.1002/nme.172.abs","title":"A 2‐D time‐domain boundary element method with damping","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary element method; Element (criminal law); Time domain; Finite element method; Boundary (topology); Structural engineering; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003712253,0.0007177736,0.000758972,0.0003922466,0.0005030723,0.0007256845,0.001408042,0.001906086,0.009140784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009740471,0.0005107029,0.0004208778,0.0003104708,0.0004820452,0.0008942147,0.001155752,0.001035183,0.003010873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001552938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005379369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006772633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001155967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999795,0.00005852913,0.000009584697,0.00002535337,0.00009916937,0.00001246628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997284,0.0001173003,0.0000177933,0.00003887609,0.00007324442,0.00002437592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002182813,0.0003265822,0.0008094622,0.0004877196,0.00006422737,0.0002737086,0.0004146771,0.6563922,0.09518393,0.05184273,0.006255055,0.1877314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003780427,0.00005426921,0.00007687413,0.00002207795,0.000009418774,0.00008526565,0.00002244186,0.9833872,0.00366779,0.002162941,0.01046042,0.00001359238],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003829465,0.00005848111,0.9908982,0.0000880928,0.00011058,0.00005272098,0.00004465101,0.000325585,0.004592326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1224002,0.0001720101,0.8640159,0.0002495608,0.00005744705,0.0004772975,0.0001890561,0.0003984562,0.01203989],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009140784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03057897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0158601208051883,"score_gpt":0.3688066616912258,"score_spread":0.3529465408860376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}