{"id":"W2109195368","doi":"10.1002/nme.172.abs","title":"A 2‐D time‐domain boundary element method with damping","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary element method; Element (criminal law); Time domain; Finite element method; Boundary (topology); Structural engineering; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001537229,0.00027197,0.0003749601,0.0004185232,0.00006173951,0.0001237413,0.0003931092,0.00009255407,0.0002253143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003851824,0.0002478678,0.000143843,0.0004623878,0.00002326054,0.0002097271,0.00003625601,0.0005213615,0.000007247319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003759112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003066307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002666772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.965353e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981197,0.0001685389,0.0006010106,0.0002366375,0.0003813374,0.0004927718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983316,0.001120289,0.00007924836,0.0001393985,0.0001357864,0.0001936497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000153689,0.0000543695,0.0001965335,0.00002113617,0.0002159419,0.00008308687,0.0002004903,0.7199051,0.02757178,0.0004257715,0.0001416302,0.2510305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001194759,0.0002072862,0.0003727768,0.00009975996,0.0000181914,0.0006674945,0.00004158651,0.8744298,0.002466025,0.002136184,0.1180022,0.000363951],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004942452,0.0003576437,0.9917912,0.0003592287,0.00138583,0.0002060397,0.000003453467,0.0001996068,0.0007544947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006570886,0.0000738436,0.9924772,0.0001513569,0.0004573062,0.00006197386,0.000005576096,0.00008472746,0.0001171203],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2506665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0158601208051883,"score_gpt":0.3688066616912258,"score_spread":0.3529465408860376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}