{"id":"W2109285358","doi":"10.1139/t09-052","title":"Shear strength testing of intact and recompacted samples of municipal solid waste","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landfill Environmental Impact Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Shearing (physics); Triaxial shear test; Geotechnical engineering; Municipal solid waste; Shear (geology); Direct shear test; Shear strength (soil); Environmental science; Structural engineering; Materials science; Geology; Engineering; Waste management; Composite material; Soil water; Soil science; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002800946,0.0001368814,0.0002790981,0.00008766531,0.000151464,0.00001722729,0.0002251438,0.00008325675,0.0004466891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000351986,0.0001133046,0.00005496392,0.0001974459,0.0003175705,0.0001491911,0.00008426487,0.0003252374,0.000005697912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002726008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003899104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02132048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002280082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988065,0.00004801693,0.000387664,0.0001469274,0.0002253524,0.0003855553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989775,0.0001063321,0.0001839487,0.0001741617,0.000008630781,0.0005493774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001840424,0.0005401889,0.3499008,0.00004448758,0.0002396752,0.0002891597,0.002896097,0.04931127,0.2478184,0.00009268536,0.00775241,0.3409309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007645914,0.001095942,0.976154,0.0001785983,0.00006230066,0.0005366361,0.0004475837,0.004418381,0.01298345,0.001436495,0.001555923,0.0003660531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997493,0.00009728984,0.00005182459,0.0005532093,0.00003048383,0.00008464443,0.00003145812,0.000009255085,0.001648803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973869,0.0000745182,0.002308136,0.0001689348,0.00003156653,4.61249e-7,0.000001662874,0.000008688158,0.00001917502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6262533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02621607158043067,"score_gpt":0.2485656108012698,"score_spread":0.2223495392208392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}