{"id":"W2109333055","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17938.x","title":"Inferring species abundance distribution across spatial scales","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Relative abundance distribution; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Relative species abundance; Sampling bias; Macroecology; Rank abundance curve; Species distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Global biodiversity; Scaling; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Sample size determination; Statistics; Habitat; Cartography; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008567364,0.00006447331,0.00006955496,0.000003709057,0.0002854636,0.00001790095,0.00008050529,0.00003711087,0.000299361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003880285,0.00006040065,0.00002482826,0.00006423003,0.0001577635,0.0001171442,0.00005618736,0.00006441146,0.0003781172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008381544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001641404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000401926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001736504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994889,0.00001315884,0.00009270637,0.000135057,0.00009072111,0.0001794048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998277,0.00002177129,0.00003585638,0.00008278532,0.000005047412,0.00002683198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001530036,0.0000858858,0.9639289,0.000003377813,0.000007579829,0.000006353298,0.0008532304,0.002147156,0.002684618,0.003315749,0.001553319,0.02539847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001144123,0.00003304768,0.9925042,0.000003251085,0.000002028547,0.00000175768,0.00005076308,0.001282643,0.0004413107,0.001582431,0.00390837,0.00007577304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763226,0.00002313243,0.008724355,0.0007026609,0.0001140546,0.00005788907,0.00001663395,0.00004063131,0.01399805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982218,0.00002309517,0.0001599655,0.0001840481,0.00004126012,0.000004192243,0.00001746667,0.000002040622,0.00134614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02857525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4860057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008711153846086056,"score_gpt":0.2498970222492473,"score_spread":0.2411858684031613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}