{"id":"W2109333055","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17938.x","title":"Inferring species abundance distribution across spatial scales","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Relative abundance distribution; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Relative species abundance; Sampling bias; Macroecology; Rank abundance curve; Species distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Global biodiversity; Scaling; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Sample size determination; Statistics; Habitat; Cartography; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116292,0.0003433057,0.0004167946,0.001647427,0.0002974827,0.0006811802,0.000526991,0.0004898492,0.0005396326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007916484,0.0004423696,0.0004832029,0.001051282,0.0004071681,0.001388566,0.0008355631,0.0004568378,0.0002010024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004198308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000267243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01202203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01274957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995995,0.0001427897,0.00002273526,0.0001415738,0.0000655794,0.00002783931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997263,0.001821483,0.000366711,0.0003069548,0.0001729342,0.00006882297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116995,0.00008342602,0.5201932,0.0001440818,0.0002106557,0.0002909164,0.0005087465,0.3236092,0.009928194,0.006187976,0.000736828,0.1379898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001379979,0.00002350778,0.1659405,0.0000243798,0.00002829293,0.0001784802,0.0001827545,0.8163023,0.001599888,0.01476968,0.0009111217,0.00002536293],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7543655,0.0004695028,0.2417563,0.0001848946,0.00001091553,0.00002355153,0.0005612767,0.0003648544,0.002263222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709271,0.0001230073,0.02854745,0.00001841332,0.000009272139,0.00001106782,0.0002237563,0.000009665086,0.0001302855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01202203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02390409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008711153846086056,"score_gpt":0.2498970222492473,"score_spread":0.2411858684031613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}