{"id":"W2109346853","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011","title":"GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1843,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Funnel plot; Publication bias; Observational study; Reporting bias; Suspect; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Non-response bias; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice; Quality of evidence; Randomized controlled trial; Quality (philosophy); Sample size determination; MEDLINE; Psychology; Statistics; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null}