{"id":"W2109349352","doi":"10.2193/2008-292","title":"Feasibility and Recommendations for Swift Fox Fecal DNA Profiling","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Parks Canada; Government of Alberta; Trent University","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Genotyping; Biology; Population; Vulpes; DNA profiling; Feces; Genotype; Genetics; Computational biology; DNA; Medicine; Ecology; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06975455,0.001753603,0.0009725912,0.003366569,0.0023066,0.004008183,0.008720044,0.01480382,0.01718325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09097917,0.0009471334,0.001666141,0.001853378,0.002039027,0.005049794,0.003093344,0.004851159,0.01235953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002254818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0210867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01260356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01601522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.959953,0.01914194,0.003966831,0.002799245,0.01158226,0.002556774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8570644,0.03475892,0.009846253,0.008619521,0.07622231,0.01348859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008765432,0.002528516,0.04156479,0.005474705,0.0001396672,0.002097177,0.002354703,0.003713518,0.03962185,0.009544232,0.3602134,0.531871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003560348,0.002657269,0.04797202,0.007142617,0.0003259413,0.0019742,0.007456777,0.005856688,0.02555661,0.009660251,0.8906145,0.0004270161],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06890055,0.01633442,0.2304507,0.4864678,0.01489468,0.04203328,0.008329061,0.005967308,0.1266223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07578031,0.008890755,0.7805622,0.05644906,0.002448283,0.02303975,0.005186548,0.000650691,0.04699236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06975455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3689017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02398178689008346,"score_gpt":0.273978566514772,"score_spread":0.2499967796246885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}