{"id":"W2109371943","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfp051","title":"The Dynamics of Party Identification Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Dynamics (music); Public opinion; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00589515,0.0001651927,0.0006203088,0.0009439511,0.001587875,0.003746056,0.001145664,0.001002818,0.004669143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03006017,0.0003964992,0.0005090121,0.001477749,0.002532765,0.00601382,0.002190262,0.002104212,0.0004922309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001543221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008517685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005017378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006159953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962476,0.002077615,0.0001166083,0.0008444425,0.0003441644,0.0003695184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828953,0.009972367,0.003240712,0.002786915,0.0006749353,0.0004299218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004787806,0.0001465831,0.2816646,0.0001027645,0.0001887026,0.0003475869,0.01207413,0.03624642,0.001364403,0.5612055,0.001661517,0.104519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006395176,0.0001782399,0.1511377,0.00009439242,0.0001055137,0.0005764316,0.00707843,0.2714496,0.001113142,0.5584764,0.009620157,0.0001060191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388813,0.0002985392,0.0428953,0.002325581,0.00003374361,0.000030261,0.0002210409,0.00005518834,0.01525908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974977,0.00005316086,0.001424677,0.00004139817,0.0000114362,0.000008736675,0.0000545606,0.000007048943,0.0009012198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00589515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03117692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05649191294445487,"score_gpt":0.3555157785163353,"score_spread":0.2990238655718804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}