{"id":"W2109409153","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.010","title":"The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":395,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Burden of proof; Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Computer science; Persuasion; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008135465,0.0000592804,0.00009343086,0.00003911876,0.00007776413,0.00002748123,0.0002988454,0.00002923534,0.000001393939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005031272,0.00004165277,0.00002859021,0.0001361141,0.00008650367,0.0001113487,0.00007882169,0.00004073786,0.000003020524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001069808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002294715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002233852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001226251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999105,0.00002431121,0.0003863462,0.0001457025,0.0002025681,0.0001360724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993135,0.0001396946,0.0001591517,0.0002515051,0.0001019826,0.00003410866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001890608,0.00005367508,0.0002449321,0.00003768459,0.00001530437,7.892511e-7,0.008994219,0.01379715,0.08677007,0.564131,0.00002098815,0.3259152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007090296,0.00003275885,0.00009463742,0.00001483734,0.000002024855,6.169807e-7,0.0003040885,0.5126845,0.4734483,0.01333075,0.00004169803,0.00003870458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1799961,0.0002009346,0.8190691,0.0001891318,0.0001150059,0.0001510388,8.104669e-7,0.000009659434,0.0002681987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955726,0.00002685295,0.004287656,0.000008768744,0.0000293298,0.000003035084,1.732108e-7,0.000002530829,0.00006905197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8155765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1698551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06968742521884552,"score_gpt":0.3039494755120507,"score_spread":0.2342620502932052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}