{"id":"W2109527949","doi":"10.1139/l06-023","title":"Use of wet cellulose to cure shotcrete repairs on bridge soffits. Part 1: Field trial and observations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Innovative concrete reinforcement materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shotcrete; Curing (chemistry); Cellulose; Materials science; Composite material; Cracking; Chemistry; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006490707,0.0005151122,0.0004909625,0.0005052027,0.0005789081,0.0001768117,0.000375969,0.0005616939,0.001493042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004998465,0.0002048645,0.0005246119,0.0001817495,0.0003297825,0.0003005401,0.0002818362,0.0004539203,0.0002172685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002909942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002858594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006827763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997323,0.00004069485,0.00001228964,0.00005218703,0.0001004207,0.00006199006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995288,0.0001598336,0.00008106704,0.00005937279,0.0001069686,0.00006406983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006847287,0.001336352,0.002542148,0.0001566963,0.0000218882,0.0002960133,0.0003896274,0.0009354785,0.9860513,0.00003758867,0.00006487405,0.00748334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008704693,0.02288794,0.01753246,0.00001489709,0.00004149679,0.0002605243,0.0002841302,0.0008000497,0.9570637,0.00002351432,0.0009887567,0.00001535541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990044,0.00008830275,0.0005131239,0.000005950789,0.000004960173,0.00005141324,0.00004580173,0.0000107918,0.0002751789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950854,0.0002295329,0.002225052,0.00001862294,0.000007900723,0.00003965634,0.0002498671,0.00001649192,0.002127438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002858594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005683899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03454056046882193,"score_gpt":0.2042266330068532,"score_spread":0.1696860725380313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}