{"id":"W2109726451","doi":"10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.028","title":"A fictitious domain formulation for flows with rigid particles: A non-Lagrange multiplier version","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Physics","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Lagrange multiplier; Fictitious domain method; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Constraint algorithm; Extrapolation; Constraint (computer-aided design); Finite element method; Rigid body; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Body force; Classical mechanics; Mathematical optimization; Geometry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009777438,0.0001109432,0.0001728872,0.00005428985,0.00009307637,0.00003428933,0.00005213364,0.00002843968,0.000002240075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005093542,0.00009310059,0.00008752714,0.0001370921,0.0000147931,0.0003682061,0.000007084076,0.00007482288,0.000007497246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009880185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002991863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003629959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991907,0.000009294701,0.0003084115,0.00006589715,0.0003003938,0.0001252493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999116,0.0002491184,0.000152072,0.00005015884,0.0003989415,0.00003373492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009185381,0.0000564339,0.0004921529,0.00003294935,0.0000766494,0.000002409098,0.0002747346,0.9945723,0.0005017558,0.001430384,0.001817055,0.0006512965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003064224,0.0001271573,0.0105841,0.00005225257,0.00005802316,0.00001502384,0.0000718316,0.9371335,0.000405532,0.04667477,0.001662398,0.0001511925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5138718,0.00002778626,0.4856526,0.00005360554,0.00007852227,0.0001185308,0.00001193078,0.0000235079,0.0001616958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380504,0.000001299853,0.06147466,0.00002602036,0.0003881878,0.000005625036,0.00002419217,0.00002129592,0.000008325578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4241786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3796532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008581522060011063,"score_gpt":0.2245544354758361,"score_spread":0.2159729134158251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}