{"id":"W2109726451","doi":"10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.028","title":"A fictitious domain formulation for flows with rigid particles: A non-Lagrange multiplier version","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Physics","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Lagrange multiplier; Fictitious domain method; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Constraint algorithm; Extrapolation; Constraint (computer-aided design); Finite element method; Rigid body; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Body force; Classical mechanics; Mathematical optimization; Geometry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001408145,0.001290009,0.001285131,0.001234883,0.001039829,0.002332481,0.003468506,0.003688815,0.007798698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00362088,0.0009419588,0.001173812,0.0009459187,0.002821636,0.004604822,0.003088162,0.003815048,0.001217281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009593423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001467014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001863823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002176889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995005,0.0001958368,0.00002521235,0.00008633949,0.0001457783,0.00004636217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991595,0.0002586229,0.000104344,0.0001152241,0.0001824777,0.0001799283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002007501,0.0000581038,0.00008347382,0.00009301775,0.00001723789,0.0001114572,0.00007463017,0.04050919,0.001290444,0.951686,0.002651525,0.00340491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003694953,0.00003422351,0.0001133494,0.00002839733,0.00001352137,0.0001020271,0.00004440689,0.7105833,0.0004665994,0.2818666,0.006678877,0.00003178797],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02065918,0.001071737,0.9361413,0.003648435,0.001184962,0.0001538375,0.0002415815,0.00009805829,0.0368008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.307448,0.0019823,0.5828916,0.002881323,0.002468473,0.0005895516,0.0005306989,0.0008508829,0.1003572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007798698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02608925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008581522060011063,"score_gpt":0.2245544354758361,"score_spread":0.2159729134158251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}