{"id":"W2109736015","doi":"10.3111/13696990701679230","title":"Contingent valuation of inhaled insulin: a Canadian perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Economics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Medtronic (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Insulin; Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Diabetes mellitus; Confidence interval; Valuation (finance); Internal medicine; Environmental health; Endocrinology; Economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022552,0.0002162333,0.0002759863,0.0007809019,0.001430252,0.001493877,0.0003906448,0.0003294726,0.004426558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004349981,0.0001180283,0.0003215582,0.001413187,0.0009301016,0.0004443821,0.0002825872,0.0004676377,0.00008512031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01948169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01066175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.952638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9578015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992423,0.0002106477,0.00002093365,0.00003822883,0.0003390711,0.0001488354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982638,0.0006796973,0.0001883796,0.00004950461,0.000623049,0.0001956161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008390219,0.0003486317,0.7152208,0.0004961473,0.0002854353,0.002702817,0.00974428,0.02311921,0.003332886,0.07892882,0.01561661,0.1493653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153679,0.0002368623,0.8875327,0.0004143548,0.000200755,0.0009217545,0.0160568,0.03868956,0.0006522764,0.01766728,0.03736303,0.000149099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149791,0.005131595,0.003280544,0.009268732,0.00003988386,0.00008689779,0.001292935,0.000007516014,0.06591282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966959,0.00145563,0.0005676908,0.0001694987,0.0000129527,0.000005288261,0.0001281483,0.00000121801,0.000963681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04736203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1413502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5709903698322264,"score_gpt":0.555987075065585,"score_spread":0.01500329476664142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}