{"id":"W2109891159","doi":"10.1145/966930.966932","title":"Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":303,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Collaborative software; Usability; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Workspace; Task (project management); Computer-supported cooperative work; Context (archaeology); Interface (matter); Teamwork; Task analysis; User interface; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Systems engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02955329,0.001980253,0.001346119,0.005876501,0.001939352,0.003433309,0.00143515,0.0009582745,0.007727252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1132611,0.0007571241,0.00193897,0.004336759,0.001179187,0.004210151,0.002899562,0.002133256,0.001540937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003568077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003734801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002763105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9565008,0.03099645,0.00272118,0.001634044,0.007466401,0.0006810798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9028022,0.06268313,0.00398184,0.01136078,0.01833395,0.0008381258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001056838,0.0006951721,0.005492898,0.001968759,0.0002345692,0.00009804044,0.004606941,0.01612039,0.0129092,0.05693269,0.008680677,0.8912038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001025911,0.003612667,0.02660118,0.00165095,0.0006073066,0.0006057108,0.005755621,0.6192532,0.04413094,0.1943555,0.1017158,0.0006851614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01794427,0.0003122775,0.9726795,0.0001521206,0.00008889177,0.002237913,0.0002416303,0.001578512,0.004764791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0961794,0.0001782643,0.8966017,0.00005739228,0.00002904926,0.005077552,0.0004125248,0.0004070685,0.001056968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02955329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1562946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08157917640863166,"score_gpt":0.3458757302966998,"score_spread":0.2642965538880681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}