{"id":"W2110032744","doi":"10.1002/rra.2684","title":"STREAM RESTORATION AND CRIBWALL PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF CRIBWALL MONITORING IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"River Research and Applications","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stream power; STREAMS; Stream restoration; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed; Floodplain; Channel (broadcasting); Sediment; Bank erosion; Geology; Ecology; Geotechnical engineering; Computer science; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003711276,0.0003111114,0.0002664751,0.0006121548,0.003284018,0.0007983122,0.0007461975,0.0005304746,0.0009273001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001359439,0.000232345,0.0001726998,0.001360992,0.00102257,0.0002420885,0.0005672954,0.000370359,0.0001096541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01724946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008706374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995289,0.00005535425,0.00001386441,0.00006680653,0.0001821295,0.0001529923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.0001222199,0.000166082,0.00004260419,0.0003187699,0.0002114761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002565965,0.0002927538,0.9347209,0.0001019589,0.00005274191,0.009079618,0.02400115,0.001339527,0.006321731,0.000319239,0.001196178,0.02231765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001148922,0.0002296597,0.9756537,0.00002026072,0.00002052629,0.0005790838,0.0180268,0.001116018,0.0007468534,0.00006604611,0.003511906,0.00001769904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988112,0.00003434798,0.00009574989,0.00004837172,8.363041e-7,0.0000286614,0.00006307242,0.00000458683,0.0009131295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997488,0.00009458844,0.0004538169,0.00003081069,0.000001586817,0.00001808488,0.0001021485,0.000004016101,0.001806948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05470949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1251542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04629096861290354,"score_gpt":0.3096029334462341,"score_spread":0.2633119648333305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}