{"id":"W2110161623","doi":"10.1142/s1464333201000686","title":"ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER CAMAQUÃ RIVER WATERSHED (BRAZIL) — A STUDY OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Identification (biology); Environmental resource management; Natural (archaeology); Land use; Work (physics); Watershed management; Environmental planning; Natural resource; Field (mathematics); Geography; Environmental science; Water resource management; Civil engineering; Ecology; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003358795,0.0001347088,0.0001667796,0.0004819404,0.0009568968,0.0009253712,0.0003540709,0.00029406,0.001164974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001267633,0.0001057572,0.0001321744,0.001399716,0.0008173449,0.0004130217,0.0006213193,0.000256341,0.00006376416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003647852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002323243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1822748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3556207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997261,0.0001372937,0.000007265968,0.00003131858,0.00004661757,0.00005132934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996862,0.0001455001,0.00006343891,0.00001569054,0.00004234205,0.00004692132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001738279,0.0007160037,0.6744563,0.0006176442,0.00008680678,0.006973469,0.06880669,0.01287582,0.01359868,0.03152348,0.003726653,0.1864447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001854033,0.0001797951,0.898504,0.0001377777,0.00002570216,0.000572957,0.06170514,0.008123051,0.001877889,0.00367491,0.0251528,0.00002762659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936426,0.000123017,0.0003628653,0.000407305,0.000001451105,0.00002371054,0.00006702489,0.000004260554,0.00536786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979201,0.0002278246,0.0008323633,0.0000318567,0.000001411751,0.00001997466,0.0000784248,0.000002934099,0.0008851622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1822748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3624276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01196239943297664,"score_gpt":0.2909107645714973,"score_spread":0.2789483651385207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}