{"id":"W2110161623","doi":"10.1142/s1464333201000686","title":"ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER CAMAQUÃ RIVER WATERSHED (BRAZIL) — A STUDY OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Identification (biology); Environmental resource management; Natural (archaeology); Land use; Work (physics); Watershed management; Environmental planning; Natural resource; Field (mathematics); Geography; Environmental science; Water resource management; Civil engineering; Ecology; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005199556,0.0002873623,0.0004773602,0.0003332369,0.0001942056,0.00003010047,0.0003352806,0.00006590559,0.0006217457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003267302,0.0002145686,0.000206214,0.0002922481,0.0005344734,0.0003804022,0.0007015449,0.0001932204,0.000003429462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005202915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001564632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002377449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002269919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973185,0.0002682928,0.0009030435,0.0003360568,0.0008884326,0.0002856589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985547,0.00004468374,0.0008575653,0.0003739798,0.00000164515,0.0001674457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001749911,0.007144834,0.9536576,0.0000338055,0.001759018,0.00002563388,0.006256967,0.003629456,0.01276747,0.0002083582,0.0002273822,0.01411454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319675,0.00072224,0.9827863,0.00002951245,0.00125195,0.00002936767,0.008122274,0.0002609799,0.0003105001,0.0001363288,0.004820644,0.0002102278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976298,0.000123178,0.0001414536,0.000359479,0.0001223773,0.0005472775,0.00005279387,0.000003712498,0.001019974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976773,0.0007628278,0.0004615384,0.0003396284,0.00004432064,0.00001490909,0.00001312893,0.00001584214,0.0006705291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02912876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8749852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01196239943297664,"score_gpt":0.2909107645714973,"score_spread":0.2789483651385207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}