{"id":"W2110283060","doi":"10.1518/001872005775570970","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of <i>Human Factors</i> (1970-2000): A Quantitative Description of Scientific Impact","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society","topic":"Technology Assessment and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Parallels; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Citation analysis; Citation; Diversity (politics); Data science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008118743,0.0009513529,0.001621145,0.1304124,0.001164202,0.004996935,0.0009411012,0.0007855945,0.003524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06170819,0.0002695462,0.002110884,0.2002801,0.001293495,0.004811337,0.002195559,0.0008138732,0.001434185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00291979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002557417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006191006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004513635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835459,0.002421039,0.002638393,0.0008160582,0.0100417,0.0005369327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9429559,0.0278945,0.01458585,0.00263508,0.01102038,0.000908355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003831558,0.000215852,0.5363491,0.008534711,0.003488191,0.0005262853,0.00467167,0.008624748,0.003419922,0.02667164,0.03408051,0.3730343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004397234,0.0003240211,0.8686067,0.001041729,0.0007636605,0.001363264,0.00317197,0.006583952,0.003528503,0.01485938,0.09949804,0.0002148809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5712033,0.05818307,0.05270759,0.004265268,0.001396616,0.001465299,0.1202077,0.00271623,0.1878549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169326,0.01989296,0.01997079,0.000304375,0.001138248,0.001048632,0.034743,0.0002483592,0.005721119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04293656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04344807539345339,"score_gpt":0.2883137759833057,"score_spread":0.2448657005898523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}