{"id":"W2110286110","doi":"10.1136/jech.2006.057539","title":"Examining the relationships between job control and health status: a path analysis approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Medicine; Attrition; Job control; Gerontology; Cohort study; Observational study; Environmental health; Demography; Work (physics); Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1430985,0.0002335109,0.00195236,0.0004867123,0.006621623,0.000005452835,0.0004009912,0.0002494262,0.00001240325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008260828,0.0001471734,0.0002018739,0.000697132,0.0003440697,0.0001313713,0.0002034532,0.006390572,0.000003092524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006232248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008225545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01634691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9579132,0.03694417,0.003408446,0.0002037845,0.000235494,0.001294965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483251,0.0463201,0.003715118,0.0006804612,0.0003228743,0.0006363278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006376379,0.00005605039,0.9700507,0.0001261979,0.0007904287,4.328362e-7,0.01645804,0.00002900261,2.139005e-7,0.002427709,0.006566013,0.003431458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001082298,0.0006262525,0.9530963,0.0001510593,0.0002485643,0.000003259228,0.03587204,0.00005261687,9.805794e-9,0.002590845,0.006185287,0.00009149112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8181688,0.01263012,0.07874537,0.0871191,0.0002718682,0.0008563276,0.0000481527,0.00004490394,0.002115326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789335,0.003192498,0.004242397,0.01310656,0.0004044219,0.00001020653,0.000032567,0.00001836749,0.00005948043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1607647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4514239005642042,"score_gpt":0.5146639688319801,"score_spread":0.06324006826777584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}