{"id":"W2110328693","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.001","title":"Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Second Language Writing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Argumentative; Psychology; Writing assessment; Inter-rater reliability; Second language writing; Assertiveness; Rhetorical question; Empirical research; Composition (language); Linguistics; Rating scale; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Second language; Developmental psychology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001564392,0.0001643395,0.0004130135,0.0001794248,0.0003030559,0.000171755,0.0002388987,0.00002434625,0.0007193207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002549662,0.0001014585,0.00009597607,0.0001628742,0.0002503242,0.0004427657,0.00003449955,0.0003944538,0.000001436432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004806205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008445335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000713569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008241268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979475,0.0004189851,0.0008732596,0.0001790107,0.0003517006,0.0002296092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982149,0.0004099567,0.0008325232,0.0002021172,0.0002830487,0.00005745524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005059922,0.0008730356,0.4847816,0.00003300439,0.0005598294,0.0001987675,0.4760468,0.00007749646,0.0001745617,0.03601151,0.0001355858,0.001057297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001111953,0.0004771976,0.04426015,0.0001220056,0.0002052269,0.00007537152,0.9522228,0.000008187812,0.00009324912,0.0008856394,0.0003777216,0.0001604941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785576,0.001111137,0.00004850736,0.0005058,0.00003284905,0.0001802885,0.00001520159,0.00001068192,0.0195379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985443,0.000009315464,0.000642243,0.0003096363,0.0002107332,0.00001374047,0.000004582779,0.00001785566,0.0002476028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4761761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7876057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0699805879439953,"score_gpt":0.3904873306741975,"score_spread":0.3205067427302022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}