{"id":"W2110328693","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.001","title":"Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Second Language Writing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Argumentative; Psychology; Writing assessment; Inter-rater reliability; Second language writing; Assertiveness; Rhetorical question; Empirical research; Composition (language); Linguistics; Rating scale; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Second language; Developmental psychology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01537659,0.0003531508,0.0005395825,0.001157785,0.003687212,0.007641035,0.001407824,0.002477429,0.004120985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320818,0.0006323767,0.0002324396,0.0008272944,0.00583358,0.004922146,0.004896195,0.003960547,0.0005802629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001489581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002263342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001413929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002085687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902406,0.006124957,0.0005665999,0.000933655,0.001578488,0.0005557435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7558248,0.2128669,0.01258854,0.006357308,0.008127559,0.004234785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006861441,0.002758541,0.1243301,0.0002836768,0.00003469221,0.000868178,0.8171592,0.0001607052,0.009619886,0.005682603,0.0004220029,0.03799433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001748322,0.001426731,0.2552191,0.000267124,0.0000833439,0.001527827,0.716518,0.001982813,0.009769813,0.007777416,0.005159829,0.00009319877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996646,0.00003572114,0.0003817975,0.0002110024,0.000007170958,0.00003019552,0.00000488966,0.000003616005,0.002679686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.00002074725,0.0002534994,0.00005522609,0.000006125673,0.00003115276,0.000006334074,0.000005653334,0.0004569892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01537659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08132011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0699805879439953,"score_gpt":0.3904873306741975,"score_spread":0.3205067427302022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}