{"id":"W2110424412","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00270.x","title":"Real options for precautionary fisheries management","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan State University; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Rubric; Fisheries management; Business; Investment (military); Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Fishery; Fishing; Finance; Financial economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005942182,0.001590836,0.0007866705,0.00143337,0.001024641,0.005678773,0.001984837,0.003886944,0.01845649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01408019,0.0005043436,0.001117877,0.0009322002,0.003806622,0.004339435,0.003137391,0.004100001,0.001080359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004165374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003146168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002011535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958355,0.002727331,0.0001356015,0.0003422693,0.0006845964,0.0002746439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936966,0.004410286,0.000637017,0.0002965164,0.0006448054,0.0003147798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002199175,0.00003390082,0.0001582285,0.0000911778,0.00002198993,0.00006617334,0.00008945213,0.09795552,0.0001401379,0.8873394,0.00216666,0.01191547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001348218,0.00003456455,0.00008955876,0.0001345648,0.00001220075,0.00002900258,0.0001191621,0.1159337,0.0001085844,0.8731961,0.01031152,0.00001750584],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04141902,0.009350127,0.6389336,0.02932567,0.000922941,0.000343667,0.0003570451,0.0001811632,0.2791668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.891669,0.003678008,0.07549076,0.0008975176,0.0005024516,0.0004777462,0.0001510904,0.00006761454,0.02706585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01845649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06174308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04032057475789731,"score_gpt":0.2046000918646056,"score_spread":0.1642795171067083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}