{"id":"W2110428972","doi":"10.22230/jem.2005v6n2a312","title":"Assessing the need for species conservation action in British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Endangered species; Biogeography; Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Stewardship (theology); Wildlife conservation; Abundance (ecology); Threatened species; Habitat; Biology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001031647,0.0001850284,0.0002272426,0.002707793,0.003954821,0.001744729,0.001309475,0.0006702301,0.003037925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005505231,0.0002041911,0.0001227803,0.002888605,0.00109009,0.0006273145,0.001156865,0.0008757034,0.0002187053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03279081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02561562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986296,0.0001801561,0.00008120681,0.00008269522,0.0005821396,0.0004442259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936391,0.0005793874,0.0004584538,0.00007911048,0.003467545,0.001776485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001726185,0.0001482423,0.8499681,0.0002857654,0.000111211,0.001186834,0.007081283,0.001808106,0.001456462,0.001262703,0.02866665,0.1078522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001120708,0.000037325,0.9747111,0.0001206616,0.00002809259,0.00008138284,0.01531138,0.001039453,0.0001838002,0.0002375475,0.008211114,0.00002698293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655231,0.0008174141,0.000138237,0.003572069,0.00002551634,0.0001042118,0.001081869,0.00003435607,0.02870326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929451,0.0005189419,0.0004612497,0.0004729262,0.000005197576,0.00004506709,0.0006088654,0.000006086453,0.004936379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03279081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2379151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02405175900169425,"score_gpt":0.250016718634346,"score_spread":0.2259649596326518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}