{"id":"W2110526299","doi":"10.1080/713609924","title":"The Aquatic Environment and Textile Mill Effluents — An Ecological Risk Assessment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Dye analysis and toxicity","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Environmental science; Wastewater; Sewage treatment; Aquatic ecosystem; Waste management; Textile; Paper mill; Dyeing; Pulp and paper industry; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Engineering; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001788496,0.0002906031,0.000323054,0.00006666214,0.001620665,0.0009866598,0.0004917466,0.0001791054,0.005279278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001777225,0.0001811411,0.0001597669,0.00003557491,0.0002676772,0.0004257825,0.0001716325,0.0009789886,0.00001877204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003120186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005170267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002825215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001104513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971721,0.000545102,0.0006408546,0.0005014668,0.0007212132,0.0004193244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983191,0.0003740046,0.0005538729,0.0002556085,0.00007731735,0.0004200624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342926,0.002403734,0.975714,0.000004466412,0.0005265188,0.0000908167,0.0001060967,0.0002872136,0.001376703,0.008029092,0.0002071431,0.01122074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001517197,0.0006385501,0.9516634,0.00001161265,0.000186517,0.00009011728,0.0007331931,0.00976951,0.00006793095,0.02241143,0.01258698,0.0003235385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915088,0.00008553109,0.0004104174,0.0001639667,0.0001619005,0.00009226251,0.00003134179,0.00002588483,0.007519851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937032,0.003511626,0.001797232,0.0001507597,0.0002529982,0.00002796547,0.00004005192,0.00001489417,0.0005012708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02405063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01892821417534114,"score_gpt":0.3195762978905131,"score_spread":0.3006480837151719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}