{"id":"W2110645202","doi":"10.1109/36.921425","title":"Four-Scale Linear Model for Anisotropic Reflectance (FLAIR) for plant canopies. I. Model description and partial validation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Bidirectional reflectance distribution function; Remote sensing; Canopy; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Reflectivity; Inversion (geology); Tree canopy; Environmental science; Optics; Geology; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001897522,0.0001930955,0.0001688542,0.00005577499,0.0008145581,0.00008625323,0.00007265632,0.0001239874,0.000001392815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001034224,0.0001621569,0.00006144709,0.0002087021,0.0002379356,0.0003622587,0.00000354061,0.0001317617,0.00000255367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002533504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002280332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008275289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985895,0.00002344419,0.0002195527,0.0005467948,0.000240357,0.0003804125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995385,0.00004958666,0.00008141826,0.0001718612,0.00003376216,0.0001248685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815034,0.00004629353,0.000006353067,0.00002547785,0.000008323019,0.000003145307,0.001237243,0.4765714,0.2495105,0.000008171854,0.0001600111,0.2722415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000394027,0.0001198421,0.00007281077,0.00004644942,0.00003764269,0.0001014292,0.00005728151,0.9794362,0.01848797,0.000758328,0.0002718383,0.0002162326],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3341161,0.000006231866,0.6648472,0.0003413256,0.0002086988,0.0003486198,0.00001578837,0.00004289501,0.00007312035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.677874,0.000178773,0.320367,0.0001904615,0.00005989367,6.917429e-7,0.000005024422,0.00001664432,0.001307549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5028647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03596336953178823,"score_gpt":0.2477540689598857,"score_spread":0.2117906994280974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}