{"id":"W2110649000","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35","title":"Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; CONTEST; Legitimacy; Rhetoric; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Teleology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01343114,0.0008306064,0.0006484409,0.007400054,0.006831689,0.01341217,0.00217077,0.00406322,0.005437635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03104503,0.0004616257,0.000652523,0.002769311,0.0510026,0.01646073,0.006670103,0.004312486,0.000920896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006054252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002691379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009907731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007923481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867433,0.007143248,0.0004992511,0.001375217,0.003426641,0.0008122903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738051,0.01946306,0.001721036,0.002268241,0.002231513,0.0005110993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004215288,0.000003755299,0.00009906013,0.00002090239,0.00000214035,0.00003871412,0.00524158,0.00007005382,0.00009522886,0.9914114,0.0003547635,0.002658008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002073778,0.00002139884,0.0002220469,0.0001603709,0.00001187661,0.0002169386,0.004457486,0.0009401112,0.0006772675,0.9043097,0.08894391,0.0000180664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.057683,0.00822084,0.1517479,0.03604278,0.00107891,0.0001692354,0.00008962627,0.0002896105,0.7446781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666364,0.001426945,0.0181063,0.001590304,0.0006827647,0.0001941466,0.00006192669,0.00014514,0.01115617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01343114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03612515697114772,"score_gpt":0.3024322837532248,"score_spread":0.2663071267820771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}