{"id":"W2110696967","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00230.x","title":"Well Vulnerability: A Quantitative Approach for Source Water Protection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ground Water","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","keywords":"Wellhead; Vulnerability (computing); Environmental science; Computer science; Vulnerability assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Petroleum engineering; Geology; Business; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002216784,0.00131182,0.0008347859,0.004705395,0.0007095281,0.002462576,0.001449773,0.00117775,0.003447664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004632857,0.0004461865,0.001017309,0.002261602,0.003565769,0.003845242,0.001814794,0.00132714,0.0003414848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002360255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001849375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003304529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003095974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998356,0.0005577374,0.00008870673,0.0001689942,0.0007176737,0.000110905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997916,0.001245067,0.000277935,0.0001714597,0.0003174229,0.0000721828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001468238,0.00002833665,0.001721565,0.0004532651,0.00008300629,0.0001687428,0.0003329472,0.2569354,0.003570134,0.681088,0.00239317,0.05321087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000503343,0.00006827642,0.001264814,0.0001690314,0.00003723591,0.000248203,0.0003497702,0.2515324,0.001486446,0.7230546,0.02172571,0.00005841172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003698964,0.001171898,0.9875365,0.0004660173,0.00005326678,0.00004419708,0.0001370183,0.0001100973,0.006781974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4820857,0.006972702,0.5005951,0.0003705707,0.0004543667,0.0005571723,0.000293721,0.0002515578,0.008419159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004705395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01712495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02169371960574993,"score_gpt":0.2260336547320032,"score_spread":0.2043399351262533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}