{"id":"W2110696967","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00230.x","title":"Well Vulnerability: A Quantitative Approach for Source Water Protection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ground Water","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","keywords":"Wellhead; Vulnerability (computing); Environmental science; Computer science; Vulnerability assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Petroleum engineering; Geology; Business; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003580847,0.0001611417,0.0001494754,0.00003135438,0.0003752459,0.00008532477,0.0001068403,0.00006029152,0.0003573489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003535277,0.0000899818,0.00008154291,0.00004777206,0.0001444527,0.0002874484,0.0001128339,0.00007613131,0.0007512397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001191217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001151439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001413515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001033584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987537,0.00006263321,0.000209076,0.0003860424,0.0001977484,0.0003907447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997461,0.00001492769,0.00002339006,0.0001650625,0.0000208235,0.00002970909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001018775,0.00242467,0.04820742,0.0004082524,0.0002854018,0.000009122193,0.02995134,0.01569559,0.8213058,0.002743883,0.01588837,0.06206144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001860254,0.0004543564,0.02019435,0.000006206558,0.00007475594,0.00001771823,0.001351529,0.01022109,0.2208408,0.007069039,0.7370952,0.0008146728],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6098555,0.000004950993,0.3859479,0.0003152698,0.00006511727,0.0005261288,0.000002032194,0.00005238066,0.003230704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500868,2.543063e-7,0.002483563,0.0001135664,0.00007970524,0.0005335267,0.00007162478,0.00001826147,0.04661266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7212068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02169371960574993,"score_gpt":0.2260336547320032,"score_spread":0.2043399351262533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}