{"id":"W2110779259","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2003.07.004","title":"High volatility, thick tails and extreme value theory in value-at-risk estimation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insurance Mathematics and Economics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Generalized Pareto distribution; Extreme value theory; Volatility (finance); Value at risk; Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Covariance; Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Risk management; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009603191,0.0007645243,0.001366864,0.001609841,0.0007911624,0.002639031,0.001390406,0.00247727,0.001514886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05876785,0.0009906726,0.0007841408,0.00131666,0.004075408,0.006895794,0.002464927,0.004666622,0.0002292974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006113988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006256826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001276481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000836254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978922,0.001452555,0.00009283095,0.0001714986,0.0002600535,0.0001309835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522584,0.04250417,0.00181767,0.001284607,0.00132776,0.0008074596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008914444,0.0000641697,0.006403605,0.0001074621,0.0001397203,0.000242733,0.0002249264,0.2109301,0.0005225422,0.7578258,0.001478862,0.02197088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001135246,0.0000160078,0.0007581362,0.00002080768,0.00001216801,0.00003983237,0.00002551519,0.267444,0.0001074441,0.7312196,0.0003279912,0.00001714869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08879008,0.004134407,0.9005268,0.0028503,0.0001673146,0.00001669051,0.00004654047,0.00008370489,0.00338414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413261,0.002506969,0.05094268,0.0003911557,0.0009042587,0.00005907579,0.0001240263,0.00005726471,0.003688533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009603191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05078709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03051396326268054,"score_gpt":0.2113543157099464,"score_spread":0.1808403524472659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}