{"id":"W2110818436","doi":"10.1002/sim.6607","title":"Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4309,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institute of Mental Health; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Covariate; Inverse probability weighting; Observational study; Inverse probability; Weighting; Average treatment effect; Statistics; Treatment and control groups; Econometrics; Sample size determination; Baseline (sea); Mathematics; Selection bias; Computer science; Posterior probability; Medicine; Bayesian probability","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3219493,0.001957789,0.00456967,0.009172669,0.001790489,0.01072376,0.007313782,0.007535535,0.002848967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5747454,0.002086388,0.003907751,0.01045066,0.02269435,0.01663251,0.01022789,0.01856037,0.001250197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00563736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01103963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004402351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003131632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5464783,0.3953557,0.02092759,0.01266301,0.02350643,0.00106892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4113832,0.5122638,0.02444915,0.03574902,0.01497808,0.001176717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009943253,0.00008329565,0.002905237,0.006163369,0.001226492,0.0001766439,0.003135765,0.009738759,0.0003221479,0.7230092,0.01097896,0.2421608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007939994,0.00007738317,0.0005319855,0.003203576,0.0001395571,0.0001094208,0.0002324469,0.008052526,0.0003939082,0.9689416,0.01816838,0.00006975682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001151097,0.01156664,0.9593448,0.02429986,0.0008635535,0.0003328921,0.0001452179,0.0001886445,0.002107228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03870384,0.01061026,0.9379324,0.008251778,0.001469575,0.00225951,0.0001742692,0.0001940757,0.000404227],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6780507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8361572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6765608631638398,"score_gpt":0.5702584500397571,"score_spread":0.1063024131240827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}