{"id":"W2110845589","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00729.x","title":"Hubbell's fundamental biodiversity parameter and the Simpson diversity index","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Metacommunity; Ecology; Biology; Diversity index; Abundance (ecology); Relative abundance distribution; Relative species abundance; Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Global biodiversity; Species diversity; Population; Species richness; Biological dispersal; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002122793,0.00008575561,0.0001107527,0.00001949022,0.0008719371,0.000009371492,0.0001503247,0.0000602643,0.0008341281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002478817,0.00006502577,0.00004020284,0.00005122228,0.00136714,0.0001244733,0.0008235599,0.0001405962,0.0005421362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001469453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001416074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003141271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993522,0.00009692507,0.00008016334,0.0001975475,0.00007398456,0.0001992397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995655,0.0002543597,0.00005154219,0.00009219952,0.000002243084,0.00003416406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004282428,0.00002517761,0.9893493,7.199921e-7,0.00004044927,0.000004322501,0.000908801,0.0005230704,0.0000227847,0.00004028363,0.008698397,0.0003438898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00107363,0.00002278958,0.9951981,3.118694e-7,0.00003109392,0.000005481039,0.0001212492,0.001668933,0.0000066476,0.0001838963,0.001606496,0.00008137838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641536,0.00001156735,0.00007900875,0.03443978,0.0001276218,0.000140096,0.000003544933,0.00001958667,0.0010252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793702,0.00002079607,0.0001589622,0.02023288,0.00001695363,0.000004323203,0.00000222614,0.000001654726,0.0001920042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9133118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006063609278793586,"score_gpt":0.1858239616480884,"score_spread":0.1797603523692948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}