{"id":"W2110855351","doi":"10.1109/aps.2005.1551263","title":"Analysis of coaxial-fed electromagnetically coupled patch antenna using FDTD","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Acoustics; Patch antenna; Antenna (radio); Electrical impedance; Transmission line; Coaxial; Microstrip antenna; Coaxial antenna; Antenna tuner; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Physics; Optics; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002224611,0.0004849549,0.0004618926,0.0003312262,0.0002180438,0.0006556191,0.0006892456,0.001069705,0.001961638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008852025,0.0002769669,0.0006125604,0.0003429101,0.0004897173,0.0005154298,0.0003304519,0.0003530838,0.000488738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005268789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003020358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002499458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001066892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997841,0.00004208249,0.000005815801,0.00002978182,0.0001167773,0.00002150128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996203,0.0001658577,0.00005162241,0.00004261792,0.0001038468,0.00001581476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001465999,0.00006894907,0.001432884,0.0001718852,0.00007042472,0.0004728325,0.0002696157,0.8840894,0.06986046,0.02268304,0.001758885,0.018975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003810371,0.00001282658,0.0001223368,0.000003640919,0.00000363218,0.00003436373,0.000009802341,0.9964768,0.002381942,0.000455793,0.0004905746,0.00000438425],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1560355,0.0005701357,0.8148329,0.0003162128,0.0001320426,0.00007002133,0.00018359,0.0009111619,0.02694845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244031,0.0004227338,0.06601105,0.00007214535,0.00003837085,0.00006879564,0.0001091361,0.0001478934,0.008726734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002499458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006562352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01403063994566179,"score_gpt":0.2766431569975716,"score_spread":0.2626125170519099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}