{"id":"W2110855351","doi":"10.1109/aps.2005.1551263","title":"Analysis of coaxial-fed electromagnetically coupled patch antenna using FDTD","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Acoustics; Patch antenna; Antenna (radio); Electrical impedance; Transmission line; Coaxial; Microstrip antenna; Coaxial antenna; Antenna tuner; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Physics; Optics; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001918253,0.0001503215,0.0004202819,0.0002729225,0.00002699036,0.00001431185,0.0001159635,0.00008257085,0.001988846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006705053,0.0001410381,0.0001634223,0.001456046,0.00003802744,0.00005415331,0.00001343384,0.0001099944,0.00001043763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000479342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001528448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006938288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004484366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988551,0.00005330741,0.0004178984,0.0001651277,0.000202855,0.0003057524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993454,0.0001989872,0.00003914354,0.0002277202,0.00008445472,0.0001042719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003613651,0.00007823586,0.003520743,0.00001707852,0.0006179241,0.000001542569,0.00007516659,0.06906382,0.9055159,0.0005290553,0.00004116617,0.02050321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812454,0.0001629272,0.01001649,0.000003417784,0.0004490761,0.000001506322,0.000007958985,0.9807217,0.007942347,0.00004844539,0.0001992506,0.0001657082],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7363189,0.0002346521,0.2605518,0.00005983328,0.00003636562,0.00008317158,0.000001683245,0.0001698859,0.002543713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9117916,0.00004558425,0.08781879,0.00010367,0.00004266548,0.000002761178,0.000006030186,0.00002149249,0.0001673776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9116578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01403063994566179,"score_gpt":0.2766431569975716,"score_spread":0.2626125170519099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}