{"id":"W2111016778","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2009.2117","title":"Linking predator risk and uncertainty to adaptive forgetting: a theoretical framework and empirical test using tadpoles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Foraging; Forgetting; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Biology; Ecology; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Communication; Mathematics; Expected utility hypothesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006257164,0.0007163481,0.0008409439,0.001223323,0.0006359081,0.002058014,0.001517161,0.001487924,0.005698462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03591281,0.0005697781,0.001067186,0.001022929,0.003329737,0.002282678,0.001715749,0.001293679,0.0002095084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008257342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005435271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003596506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002329316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988046,0.0005878804,0.00006833806,0.0003157464,0.0001087804,0.0001146284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441018,0.044575,0.007066034,0.002389194,0.001014369,0.0008535493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001709454,0.001531054,0.8320486,0.0006211225,0.00110625,0.001053956,0.003647942,0.03652038,0.01578211,0.04832509,0.0005179219,0.05713614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002133155,0.002756058,0.6617585,0.0001027168,0.001115717,0.001206725,0.002314609,0.2501087,0.00299335,0.07649026,0.0007673861,0.00017252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886382,0.0002568941,0.009195087,0.0002286287,0.000005579525,0.00003033456,0.00006167839,0.00002053396,0.001563114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964977,0.000116793,0.0031162,0.00003703834,0.000009105993,0.00002797324,0.00003653453,0.000005733708,0.0001528647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006257164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03309143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0321560667596739,"score_gpt":0.2721755266874986,"score_spread":0.2400194599278247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}