{"id":"W2111016778","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2009.2117","title":"Linking predator risk and uncertainty to adaptive forgetting: a theoretical framework and empirical test using tadpoles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Foraging; Forgetting; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Biology; Ecology; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Communication; Mathematics; Expected utility hypothesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001007488,0.0001570917,0.0001948469,0.000005411841,0.000966431,0.0001149527,0.0003650319,0.0002503856,0.00003457957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001130061,0.00004620256,0.000123976,0.0004140765,0.002251815,0.00007910223,0.0004725993,0.0004161058,6.084659e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001173341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009131012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007987084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005223291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986607,0.00001880215,0.0002009768,0.0005508125,0.0002476869,0.0003209645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991398,0.000429622,0.0001504077,0.00002853135,0.0001091434,0.0001424574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001694884,0.00004595485,0.8049483,0.00000349804,0.000003473364,3.015641e-8,0.0002678128,0.000002052502,0.1847027,0.003842404,0.0000255826,0.006141324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006376423,0.00109847,0.9605806,0.00006844942,0.00003744114,0.000009631215,0.002882474,0.004168031,0.007426693,0.02314501,0.000243047,0.0002763722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980721,0.00005767337,0.00001537459,0.001345972,0.00008334613,0.0002510409,0.0000187944,0.00003906945,0.0001165911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932308,0.00002468457,0.006273675,0.0001795128,0.0002747361,0.000007173397,3.840638e-7,8.658358e-7,0.000008184686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.177276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8296905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0321560667596739,"score_gpt":0.2721755266874986,"score_spread":0.2400194599278247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}