{"id":"W2111039651","doi":"10.1123/jsm.17.1.37","title":"Understanding Principal-Agent Relationships: Evidence from Professional Hockey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sport Management","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Principal–agent problem; Opportunism; Agency (philosophy); Reputation; Business; Salary; Certification; Compensation (psychology); Principal (computer security); Competition (biology); Public relations; Marketing; Accounting; Economics; Psychology; Corporate governance; Management; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Finance; Computer science; Political science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01421868,0.0004090427,0.0006277741,0.002315062,0.00360626,0.005069066,0.001650718,0.002337425,0.01378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07383421,0.0006506159,0.0002940429,0.00260083,0.004231883,0.005960518,0.002334934,0.002030394,0.002042406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002587797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01413089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916476,0.00518132,0.0003736864,0.0009455636,0.001175448,0.0006764166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8106248,0.1474196,0.02810133,0.004304091,0.007085878,0.002464279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001794288,0.002635299,0.6125639,0.001822026,0.0004524618,0.004842249,0.1404914,0.00371775,0.0007551335,0.09353682,0.009847985,0.1275406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004781072,0.001385873,0.4771723,0.0009821665,0.0003103471,0.00152127,0.3405699,0.009683393,0.00138798,0.06591831,0.1004572,0.0001332145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432904,0.002661633,0.004363019,0.003181241,0.00003368676,0.00007437677,0.0001126785,0.00001441047,0.04626853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938,0.001630471,0.0008353021,0.0003729041,0.00004479928,0.00003859502,0.0001236884,0.000008647455,0.003145655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01421868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0751965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2416040455151997,"score_gpt":0.2770540946311488,"score_spread":0.03545004911594909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}