{"id":"W2111298293","doi":"10.1186/2049-3258-72-41","title":"A frame-critical policy analysis of Canada’s response to the World Food Summit 1998–2008","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Public Health","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","keywords":"Framing (construction); Rhetorical question; Public policy; Policy analysis; Summit; Frame analysis; Public health; Health policy; Social policy; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Content analysis; Social science; Law; Medicine; Health care; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01286031,0.0006180144,0.0004667063,0.007887352,0.02837406,0.009930121,0.002524572,0.001826591,0.004205897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02689173,0.0004839266,0.0003680263,0.01645847,0.01480108,0.002893796,0.002910842,0.003125535,0.0002384492],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3255089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2585864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921327,0.002584175,0.000186676,0.0006502414,0.002292157,0.00215412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742736,0.01198625,0.001458886,0.0005553035,0.01045221,0.001273731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001586234,0.00007546387,0.0158438,0.0004772689,0.00002945736,0.001068242,0.7116691,0.002341149,0.0009749052,0.1971382,0.03252112,0.03770275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002034621,0.00003548397,0.03245487,0.0008169109,0.00004287514,0.00006828674,0.6998231,0.00210627,0.001067724,0.01031986,0.253158,0.0000862943],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6693254,0.005411408,0.01255318,0.05991635,0.0005081124,0.00148319,0.006878292,0.0001223806,0.2438017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975924,0.001596786,0.004960122,0.001830967,0.00005389116,0.0004766242,0.001304675,0.00007009226,0.01378297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3255089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7823141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1450062679215123,"score_gpt":0.4547952071912636,"score_spread":0.3097889392697513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}