{"id":"W2111321700","doi":"10.1139/x05-265","title":"True versus perturbed forest inventory plot locations for modeling: a simulation study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; North Carolina State University","keywords":"Plot (graphics); Kriging; Statistics; Spatial analysis; Range (aeronautics); Forest inventory; Linear regression; Geostatistics; Ordinary least squares; Mathematics; Regression; Forest plot; Regression analysis; Autocorrelation; Mean squared error; Spatial variability; Geography; Forest management; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009735842,0.001051175,0.00123161,0.0012412,0.0009200229,0.001217675,0.002066407,0.002069081,0.001988499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03079087,0.0006068156,0.001560715,0.001560968,0.001026392,0.001947897,0.001244699,0.002695828,0.00020726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002615667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001373717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05260137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0365126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970094,0.002163874,0.0001021591,0.0002913875,0.0001829998,0.00025006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416942,0.05085188,0.002286982,0.002052895,0.002218636,0.0008954044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002539019,0.0002555806,0.01034521,0.00004310855,0.00007143079,0.00009025109,0.00008826819,0.98452,0.0002007363,0.001937007,0.0004421541,0.001752469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005386158,0.0001102947,0.001145284,0.000009957881,0.00003057113,0.00001788635,0.00006072505,0.9974826,0.0001333798,0.0008425204,0.00009954735,0.00001351409],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694691,0.0003038516,0.02633129,0.000397335,0.00003573579,0.0001682065,0.0008381269,0.0001551786,0.002301221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823011,0.0001167832,0.0163787,0.00005473327,0.000009948325,0.0001533139,0.0004991674,0.00004019493,0.0004460216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05260137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1045904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.091926090977128,"score_gpt":0.3412602746476648,"score_spread":0.2493341836705368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}