{"id":"W2111357823","doi":"10.1139/x06-078","title":"Growth and development of ponderosa pine on sites of contrasting productivities: relative importance of stand density and shrub competition effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shrub; Competition (biology); Ecology; Stand development; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology; Agronomy; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001071861,0.00006483879,0.0001852848,0.0001797869,0.0001301755,0.000007089877,0.00007899131,0.00003959661,0.00003407617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003079162,0.00005684821,0.00001507615,0.0001452185,0.0007744039,0.0001396158,0.00003633483,0.0001735484,5.032604e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001281505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001921089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001688891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07253607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.00008876258,0.0002846517,0.0001139687,0.0002752533,0.0002059726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992959,0.0002275068,0.0001996711,0.0000663374,0.00008631556,0.0001242347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006366459,0.0000364243,0.980284,0.0001680222,0.00002496742,0.00003454637,0.0006042931,0.00009760028,0.004155673,0.01420948,0.0001612902,0.0001600341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004057165,0.0004459845,0.9744791,0.0001454754,0.000006543909,0.00001148995,0.0001862148,0.00001380957,0.01727221,0.006945695,0.00004198183,0.0000457092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979688,0.00023041,0.0002310603,0.0001351424,0.00001956649,0.0001945644,0.000004444099,7.150692e-7,0.001215279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989949,0.00001267126,0.0009241706,0.000005742636,0.00001176165,0.000001693624,0.00000177137,0.000003658224,0.00004358633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07084718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01696774485455315,"score_gpt":0.2445665895739771,"score_spread":0.227598844719424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}