{"id":"W2111567962","doi":"10.1139/f09-009","title":"The evaluation of reference points and stock productivity in the context of alternative indices of stock reproductive potential","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Fecundity; Reproductive value; Population; Stock (firearms); Productivity; Statistics; Fish stock; Index (typography); Stock assessment; Ecology; Fishery; Demography; Geography; Mathematics; Fishing; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009495875,0.0003997615,0.0004264084,0.001400235,0.0004426896,0.001471985,0.0006660063,0.0003774384,0.0005991968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043708,0.0001511235,0.0004546311,0.00111778,0.000773032,0.001635545,0.001256256,0.0005951155,0.00009206041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005915321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000375858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003911203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009188296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969153,0.001569399,0.0002007998,0.0002357205,0.0009890322,0.00008968818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766359,0.01603696,0.003351499,0.0008676877,0.002658005,0.0004500279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008994507,0.0001150548,0.8435023,0.0002640026,0.0004170287,0.0002569779,0.002319045,0.02133889,0.006373315,0.004836846,0.0002532717,0.1194238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005191083,0.002344028,0.9140366,0.0001418696,0.000252208,0.0004220774,0.003567759,0.06437529,0.005478722,0.007397905,0.001811831,0.0001199536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835221,0.000251585,0.01331618,0.00008825007,0.000009280037,0.00002253485,0.00009607532,0.00002138042,0.002672693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920426,0.00007345635,0.007643677,0.00001066663,0.000006435179,0.0000145636,0.0000993689,0.00000476631,0.0001045714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05021954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05455268380674939,"score_gpt":0.2937761479678905,"score_spread":0.2392234641611412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}