{"id":"W2111586169","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.12.003","title":"Structural proteomics: a tool for genome annotation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Opinion in Chemical Biology","topic":"RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Structural Genomics Consortium; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Genome Canada","keywords":"Structural genomics; Computational biology; Proteomics; Genomics; Genome; ENCODE; Functional genomics; Biology; Function (biology); Annotation; Gene Annotation; Gene; Protein structure; Genetics; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002486268,0.0004102053,0.0008293488,0.00009439216,0.0000374529,0.00001751024,0.0003440694,0.0007976922,0.00002654656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002355813,0.0003469176,0.0003865875,0.0001088761,0.00007826985,0.000002816506,0.00009870088,0.0002219613,0.00001567275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005949606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001805875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.427248e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.405006e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979444,0.0001902336,0.0006575358,0.000751942,0.00005901021,0.0003969184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999159,0.00005915842,0.0003076906,0.0003522526,0.00005920798,0.00006269837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004159781,0.00003614846,0.000005644534,0.006312695,0.000050169,6.952124e-8,0.000006029026,3.281143e-7,0.03692342,0.0007612347,0.0002507071,0.9556119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003363028,0.0001192959,3.998311e-7,0.0008693354,0.00003216692,0.00001380024,0.000001240871,0.000002301233,0.00355743,0.001137899,0.9934952,0.0004345908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002410258,0.9931738,0.001945741,0.00001250905,0.002204869,0.002082202,0.0003111255,0.00001120235,0.00001756536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00003304427,0.9887969,0.002768218,0.00001295533,0.001058211,0.001667882,0.005593598,0.00004743662,0.00002168171],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08342584910636637,"score_gpt":0.3843651198825696,"score_spread":0.3009392707762032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}