{"id":"W2111630380","doi":"10.1111/napa.12006","title":"CONNECTING LIVES: REFLECTIONS ON A SYNDEMIC APPROACH TO PREVENTION INVOLVING RESEARCH ON HOW PEOPLE RELATE TO PETS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Syndemic; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Best practice; Population; Public relations; Public health; Political science; Medicine; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931909,0.000166589,0.0002258637,0.0001759734,0.000540432,0.00004858068,0.0001860508,0.0001587952,0.0000633712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01304316,0.0001430935,0.000106886,0.0003702933,0.0001248194,0.00004785018,0.000281359,0.0005067174,0.0001600099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003411167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002564332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001044097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006355954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997623,0.0008159128,0.0002586204,0.0004674617,0.0003356269,0.0004993731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997966,0.0007502054,0.0001763149,0.0003309098,0.0005836181,0.000192959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006089286,0.01062148,0.000974556,0.000160369,0.001154951,0.00001631649,0.0159982,0.001257653,0.761685,0.0319798,0.165182,0.00488038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007464459,0.03237915,0.008297123,0.0003990509,0.0001238324,0.0002868025,0.229818,0.00005890507,0.2878863,0.0005785081,0.4382773,0.001148504],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9212496,0.0006872484,0.002107616,0.0172247,0.0003038546,0.0005552646,0.000007819266,0.00003991157,0.05782398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946841,0.0006497214,0.00181216,0.001828129,0.0003336888,0.00006259949,0.00001025461,0.00002105136,0.0005982896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4737987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4070442212608602,"score_gpt":0.5759803484002098,"score_spread":0.1689361271393496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}