{"id":"W2111876959","doi":"10.1044/nnsld20.4.125","title":"Reliability of the Conversational Interaction Coding Form When Applied to Natural Conversation of Individuals With Aphasia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Sturgeon Community Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Aphasia; Conversation; Coding (social sciences); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Session (web analytics); Applied psychology; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Communication; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06261634,0.0005922359,0.000903631,0.002542541,0.0009975814,0.001674198,0.0008248735,0.0008761404,0.0008234936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1889988,0.0004576048,0.0007214659,0.001105346,0.001734319,0.001259938,0.001749872,0.0007240225,0.0005897349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007490452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001045227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001842198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002787854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9403369,0.03577896,0.007668016,0.003989439,0.01140068,0.0008260085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8018641,0.1188822,0.01595194,0.01175132,0.05039728,0.001153199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002710588,0.0002603857,0.7058665,0.001209877,0.0006112613,0.0003428401,0.03413498,0.001714819,0.01623285,0.000921091,0.002471987,0.2335228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511346,0.002371643,0.9345334,0.0009845033,0.0003697654,0.002093185,0.01370049,0.01616171,0.01763429,0.001977991,0.009768633,0.0002532511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509555,0.001021312,0.03731843,0.0002201191,0.0003537148,0.001319015,0.0004222421,0.0002189957,0.008170769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796211,0.0002184912,0.01839511,0.00008029719,0.00006353758,0.0008372899,0.0002842825,0.00006608608,0.0004338628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9373837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3311508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006169277495147152,"score_gpt":0.2447331513237566,"score_spread":0.2385638738286094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}