{"id":"W2111954735","doi":"10.1139/x2012-003","title":"Response of plant community abundance and diversity during 10 years of cattle exclusion within silvopasture systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Grazing; Species richness; Shrub; Rangeland; Plant community; Abundance (ecology); Agronomy; Forage; Biology; Conservation grazing; Pasture; Species diversity; Pinus contorta; Grassland; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003502676,0.0002031428,0.0003447439,0.0003828207,0.0006841997,0.0006743981,0.0004638309,0.0003867998,0.0006089244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00100246,0.0001791818,0.0001653982,0.0003468498,0.0005090781,0.0002123337,0.0004570893,0.0003533778,0.00009413539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002332427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009536729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2445938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5526089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997244,0.00003766361,0.0000132434,0.00007860362,0.00004622482,0.00009980076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989335,0.0001415336,0.0003133336,0.00003930685,0.0002051078,0.0003672738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006590805,0.0001367532,0.9825401,0.0000264331,0.00009483407,0.0001255595,0.001172196,0.0002257523,0.01109069,0.00001351245,0.0000968701,0.003818298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001236957,0.0000456475,0.9995344,0.00000115035,0.000005009309,0.00001050757,0.0002129588,0.00007769131,0.00006634487,0.000002338522,0.00004139508,0.000001495781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999853,0.00003018699,0.000007951397,0.000004036195,4.3177e-7,0.000001353734,0.00004533321,6.753332e-7,0.00005698011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996803,0.00001962968,0.00002522342,0.000008299784,7.982795e-7,0.000003505138,0.0001572539,3.999073e-7,0.0001045915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2445938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4863401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0661208504975462,"score_gpt":0.266577798983789,"score_spread":0.2004569484862428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}