{"id":"W2111979541","doi":"10.1111/1467-9884.00309","title":"On the comparison between standard and random knockout tournaments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tournament; Outlier; Set (abstract data type); Tournament selection; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Selection (genetic algorithm)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136539,0.0001955918,0.0005801196,0.00002157997,0.0007097495,0.000238692,0.0004443327,0.0000706982,0.002039741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005621103,0.0001013142,0.0002200316,0.0001380857,0.0004509346,0.00009182218,0.00009326987,0.0006397107,0.00005504925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001732635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005867079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001586689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982324,0.00006371304,0.0009778677,0.0001697729,0.0002386112,0.0003176115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975609,0.001068894,0.0009051393,0.0002540605,0.00008640067,0.0001246016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002845511,0.0001403266,0.04831149,0.00005289083,0.0008387846,0.00001254656,0.003744465,0.00257061,6.863435e-7,0.5645604,0.3652278,0.01425547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003613003,0.001400344,0.2269638,0.000174147,0.0003655826,0.00002960769,0.001690262,0.1203462,0.00002262869,0.284639,0.3600618,0.000693709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.397107,0.006837982,0.5106886,0.05917256,0.00366651,0.001397649,0.00734916,0.000040044,0.01374052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953442,0.0004167028,0.001475055,0.000971241,0.0003037862,0.00000353711,0.000003067483,0.00002138378,0.001461087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5982372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03038242803137944,"score_gpt":0.2326835615070399,"score_spread":0.2023011334756605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}