{"id":"W2111979722","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.007","title":"Characterizing spatial representativeness of flux tower eddy-covariance measurements across the Canadian Carbon Program Network using remote sensing and footprint analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing of Environment","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of New Brunswick; Queen's University; McMaster University; University of Lethbridge; University of Manitoba; Université Laval; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Environmental science; Eddy covariance; Variogram; Spatial variability; Land cover; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Remote sensing; Enhanced vegetation index; Wetland; Vegetation (pathology); Geostatistics; Spatial ecology; Flux (metallurgy); Physical geography; Leaf area index; Land use; Kriging; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00138705,0.0002777305,0.0003489446,0.001509186,0.0008461765,0.0009358667,0.0007415886,0.0005309193,0.0002870872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00544657,0.0002596336,0.0003420806,0.002335513,0.0004531468,0.0005992256,0.0005184186,0.0002625455,0.00007929078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002703964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003279074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8413297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8914851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992618,0.00007925296,0.00004454278,0.000212478,0.0002299155,0.0001720282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974856,0.0007637148,0.0002777306,0.0002335376,0.001131079,0.0001082372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001479223,0.00008401787,0.9412582,0.00005012665,0.0002354194,0.00009957796,0.0005373794,0.01807775,0.007358574,0.000495356,0.001031688,0.03062399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009101153,0.000009216641,0.9670264,0.00001298107,0.00004659637,0.00005538746,0.0002943386,0.03088625,0.0008781452,0.0001073066,0.0006571866,0.00001711449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963521,0.0001087085,0.00148618,0.00004201526,0.00000457032,0.00001341699,0.001075676,0.00003074562,0.0008866657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971991,0.00005906698,0.001102318,0.00001753068,0.000003604824,0.000009947344,0.001478148,0.0000074618,0.0001228779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3192095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02970535482342958,"score_gpt":0.2613836191494275,"score_spread":0.2316782643259979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}