{"id":"W2111995807","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00483.x","title":"Defining Conservation Strategies with Historical Perspectives: a Case Study from a Degraded Oak Grassland Ecosystem","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology; Edaphic; Habitat; Novel ecosystem; Grassland; Ecosystem diversity; Endangered species; Restoration ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001959712,0.000160227,0.000229986,0.0000513384,0.0003608958,0.00002538344,0.00009315701,0.0001099972,0.00008823488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008725984,0.0001319963,0.00002780637,0.0002291561,0.0001726951,0.0002085472,0.00005386153,0.0001361675,0.00006940689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006212985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007357334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01486092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1362976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988756,0.0001765779,0.0002737233,0.0004048472,0.00008072446,0.0001885045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992898,0.0002718393,0.0001797785,0.0001634389,0.00004981723,0.00004532582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000525153,0.0002037361,0.9850221,0.00000296763,0.00007116467,0.0001922652,0.005983159,0.000557025,0.000211318,0.007496149,0.0001495391,0.00005800486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003175807,0.001177181,0.9082427,0.0000157796,0.00009593492,0.0004221064,0.07540645,0.001469743,0.00001777144,0.00859784,0.001000324,0.0003783473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910475,0.0001373593,0.005152193,0.002526764,0.0001124006,0.0003657357,0.0000168406,0.00007972224,0.0005614826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975607,0.000009585651,0.001856484,0.0003524013,0.0000177797,0.0001073754,0.00004092086,0.000009111731,0.00004569113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1214367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01764496822753097,"score_gpt":0.2479475331775483,"score_spread":0.2303025649500174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}