{"id":"W2112121239","doi":"10.1071/bt10327","title":"Defining entities in the Acacia saligna (Fabaceae) species complex using a population genetics approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Botany","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Subspecies; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Genetic structure; Taxon; Species complex; Ecology; Population; Botany; Genetic variation; Phylogenetic tree","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001389886,0.0002531462,0.0003200669,0.003482263,0.0007636568,0.001216141,0.0004560874,0.0004338827,0.0008816562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002429319,0.0001763769,0.0004464562,0.001154089,0.001010746,0.0005723826,0.00119024,0.0004662415,0.0001359012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001075893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006162828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01023995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02934656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992269,0.0002139011,0.00006191301,0.0002987547,0.0001465557,0.00005190227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988688,0.0004062419,0.0003646712,0.0001167126,0.0001478513,0.00009562399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003192425,0.0002498446,0.7023128,0.000163192,0.000448768,0.0003990229,0.007682533,0.01132437,0.1435358,0.01655484,0.0003179096,0.1166917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003155724,0.0001240855,0.9515114,0.00003823454,0.0001176092,0.0006494162,0.001512525,0.03462734,0.002377026,0.006889482,0.002060992,0.00006032562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794726,0.0001481285,0.01850983,0.00004540484,0.000003178109,0.00007791033,0.00008449307,0.00002940102,0.001629118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749487,0.00005310499,0.02424789,0.00002748542,0.000004108873,0.00004599624,0.0003984181,0.00001114401,0.0002631257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01023995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02036071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08822012855425047,"score_gpt":0.2746833702632371,"score_spread":0.1864632417089866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}