{"id":"W2112121239","doi":"10.1071/bt10327","title":"Defining entities in the Acacia saligna (Fabaceae) species complex using a population genetics approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Botany","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Subspecies; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Genetic structure; Taxon; Species complex; Ecology; Population; Botany; Genetic variation; Phylogenetic tree","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002491674,0.0001061296,0.0001336605,0.00006325292,0.00007790732,0.00003611287,0.0002407605,0.0001001887,0.00006879695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001808137,0.00008546568,0.00009488234,0.00009972679,0.00005927078,0.000009356982,0.00003256855,0.0001125253,0.000001307274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001265368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000253051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002526934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002033271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991716,0.0001055927,0.0002975281,0.0001045296,0.0001651816,0.0001555621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995081,0.000005171124,0.0002332314,0.0001406958,0.00007023848,0.00004252499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007747645,0.00005251729,0.9458126,0.00001586644,0.0000662196,0.00001373469,0.002370473,0.001028592,0.04829953,0.0004877938,0.001429016,0.0003461483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003494686,0.0001160947,0.9903808,0.00001610688,0.00004622665,0.0002133753,0.002914744,0.00002017486,0.002659535,0.0004226759,0.002738699,0.0001220955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998123,0.0002266408,0.0005094522,0.00005865753,0.0001284656,0.00006311464,0.00001149247,0.000001494304,0.0008776665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875582,0.0000359786,0.01199738,0.0001049166,0.0001283699,2.616827e-7,0.00001657162,0.000007160681,0.0001511117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3485189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08822012855425047,"score_gpt":0.2746833702632371,"score_spread":0.1864632417089866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}