{"id":"W2112326831","doi":"10.1029/2000jd000281","title":"The cloud albedo‐cloud droplet effective radius relationship for clean and polluted clouds from RACE and FIRE.ACE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Atmospheric aerosols and clouds","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Drizzle; Liquid water content; Effective radius; Cloud albedo; Environmental science; Liquid water path; Aerosol; Atmospheric sciences; Cloud computing; Albedo (alchemy); Cloud top; Meteorology; Cloud fraction; RADIUS; Sea salt aerosol; Cloud cover; Physics; Astrophysics; Precipitation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004080684,0.0002558049,0.0003589275,0.0006811679,0.0005131534,0.0004589698,0.0003804673,0.0002554215,0.0006810315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001143688,0.0002183034,0.0002960135,0.0004692846,0.000360594,0.0002675892,0.0003536172,0.0002082308,0.0001297575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001482939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004655395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2520112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3787379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997309,0.00002077684,0.00001596349,0.00005306968,0.0001020461,0.00007724907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988272,0.0003235073,0.0002505095,0.00009488865,0.0002895929,0.0002143968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00126408,0.000170723,0.9711719,0.00003787812,0.000205828,0.0003326812,0.0002035802,0.005254741,0.01536102,0.0001342675,0.0005335356,0.005329886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134497,0.00004765785,0.9953993,0.000001005644,0.00002881872,0.0001024511,0.00006256124,0.002039127,0.001984903,0.00002349705,0.0002889439,0.000008331822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986456,0.00004334591,0.00005460083,0.000006038682,0.000001373879,0.000005458633,0.0009645923,0.000006872422,0.0002721235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973651,0.00002870477,0.0001090967,0.000003891265,0.000002041238,0.000003925886,0.002319709,0.000003994027,0.0001636124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2520112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5010887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0227056172381312,"score_gpt":0.2858723820024765,"score_spread":0.2631667647643453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}