{"id":"W2112326831","doi":"10.1029/2000jd000281","title":"The cloud albedo‐cloud droplet effective radius relationship for clean and polluted clouds from RACE and FIRE.ACE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Atmospheric aerosols and clouds","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Drizzle; Liquid water content; Effective radius; Cloud albedo; Environmental science; Liquid water path; Aerosol; Atmospheric sciences; Cloud computing; Albedo (alchemy); Cloud top; Meteorology; Cloud fraction; RADIUS; Sea salt aerosol; Cloud cover; Physics; Astrophysics; Precipitation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175581,0.0002220984,0.0003711733,0.000001368297,0.001046466,0.0002156939,0.0004356112,0.0001319445,0.0003528748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001495179,0.0001457293,0.0001521363,0.0003900371,0.00113483,0.0002712159,0.0003183276,0.0008484125,0.00007251373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001848475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002482627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009333285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002045761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971271,0.0004978278,0.0004302595,0.000362196,0.0009372645,0.0006453425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932049,0.005716498,0.0002463504,0.0003011199,0.00009546809,0.0004356524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003166854,0.0008939546,0.1704531,0.00005312429,0.0004456843,0.0001200517,0.00487661,0.0006154481,0.003744627,0.003791805,0.2456287,0.5662101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003434151,0.003249664,0.8194884,0.0001159075,0.000106418,0.00005449887,0.002295548,0.04927508,0.0005844354,0.03641863,0.08447213,0.0005051102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921404,0.002183539,0.0006181481,0.003677557,0.0002132357,0.0005288962,0.00001210516,0.00001254707,0.0006136186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992578,0.0006966047,0.002728165,0.00009056205,0.0007088456,0.00002684585,9.407972e-7,0.00003350224,0.00313656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6490353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8048679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0227056172381312,"score_gpt":0.2858723820024765,"score_spread":0.2631667647643453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}