{"id":"W2112388598","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2008.4564527","title":"Sensitivity analysis of shielded coupled interconnects for RFIC applications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","topic":"Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"RFIC; Electromagnetic shielding; Interconnection; Crosstalk; Shielded cable; Electronic engineering; Electric power transmission; Sensitivity (control systems); CMOS; Materials science; Computer science; Electrical engineering; Optoelectronics; Engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005690335,0.0008991092,0.0003769806,0.0006016931,0.000237561,0.0004566064,0.0003631344,0.0007428423,0.001397733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00342847,0.0003050687,0.0003917821,0.0002804194,0.0004035763,0.000526257,0.0004244907,0.0002711833,0.0002877649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006658724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000202014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006095878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000447684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993181,0.0002016522,0.00001955086,0.0001059486,0.0002761024,0.00007861245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978738,0.001325655,0.0003191137,0.0002301372,0.0002130527,0.00003818692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003253346,0.00005916126,0.003121855,0.0002038654,0.0001577874,0.0004695591,0.0001083015,0.7208386,0.2633814,0.00179543,0.0002722142,0.009266528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000240337,0.001160592,0.006485871,0.00004180957,0.0001771328,0.0008058033,0.0000850476,0.80088,0.1865343,0.001717957,0.002035276,0.0000522488],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8884743,0.0009713604,0.101951,0.0002051335,0.00005073634,0.00008454723,0.0002849366,0.0008605226,0.007117432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962287,0.0001382496,0.003021374,0.00003857079,0.000009414698,0.0000133291,0.00007442445,0.00003594726,0.0004400283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001397733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004831254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01496278417361381,"score_gpt":0.1979441391708179,"score_spread":0.1829813549972041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}