{"id":"W2112624742","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20572","title":"Determination of the fractal dimension of alumina using adsorption: Challenges of choosing appropriate adsorbates and analysis methods","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Theoretical and Computational Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fractal dimension; Adsorption; Catalysis; Fractal; Butane; Fractal analysis; Molecule; Materials science; Surface (topology); Thermodynamics; Chemical engineering; Physical chemistry; Geometry; Chemistry; Mathematics; Organic chemistry; Mathematical analysis; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003051246,0.0003524931,0.0007779996,0.001373212,0.0004776455,0.00120481,0.0008780244,0.0006424948,0.00026031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003976168,0.0004541152,0.0002561224,0.0007297915,0.0009369266,0.0006695263,0.0004497197,0.0006944967,0.0002378035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007375122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004709837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002550774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004263547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980201,0.0005344928,0.0001147899,0.0001807942,0.001033881,0.0001159956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970452,0.001664048,0.0001742172,0.0002003322,0.0008423707,0.0000737699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000898357,0.00003185015,0.003577537,0.0003945578,0.00004125396,0.00007120551,0.000149864,0.002447134,0.9638417,0.002034929,0.0004888479,0.0268313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001655346,0.0001470312,0.01982083,0.00009625252,0.00003552968,0.0003966638,0.0003712809,0.0524428,0.9150594,0.004665761,0.006817689,0.0001302008],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7315713,0.01965226,0.2419728,0.001402509,0.0001363674,0.000238272,0.000713795,0.00052719,0.003785459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499619,0.004577676,0.1442348,0.000158203,0.00003879673,0.0001436734,0.000231077,0.0000630159,0.0005907856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003051246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01613677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01649903290590773,"score_gpt":0.2325283545836941,"score_spread":0.2160293216777864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}